Individualism And Its Place In Society In their literary journeys to differentiate a great society, twain John Stuart Mill and Alexis De Tocqueville chance on the dilemma of how to engage the people of a nation so that they take an active interest in their country and themselves, The great difficulty to be encountered does not lie in the wait of means toward an acknowledged end, but in the indifference of persons in general to the end itself (Mill, 120). In response to the question how does a government keep its citizens locked in to the events occurring around them, Mill and De Tocqueville both offer different answers. De Tocqueville proposes the rattling American idea that desolate institutions (i.e. unions) keep the populace interested, further he feels that individualism has superficial or no place in democracy at all. In stark contrast, Mill suggests that the individuality of a human beings should be nurtured to an extent where, Individual vigour and manifold variety show combine themselves in originality (Mill, 121).
        The choice as to which of these two very different theories lays the foundation for a stronger democratic nation comes dash off to a decision of whether or not individualism has some(prenominal) benefit whatsoever on a society.
In response to this choice, I must posit that Mills society, which has a place for individualism emerges from this debate as the stronger of the two. While it would calculate logical that every person be entirely immersed in the affairs of their home- (town, state, country, etc) as De Tocqueville holds, Mills thesis makes perimeter for the simple(a) fact that human nature does not forever and a day drive one to figure to the wellbeing of the democracy. Rather, sometimes it is our simple nature and in fact (as Mill would say) obligation to look to ourselves from time to...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment