Inequality in the American Justice System
David Cole wrote, our criminal umpire system affirmatively depends on inequality (5). Cole has substantial chiliad for making this statement. Race and class have eagle-eyed been issues in the criminal justice system, but does the system affirmatively depend on inequality? Does the criminal justice system depend on the disparities of the people that it serves?
American justice is supposed to be blind. Despite this in that location have been many disparities in the justice system collect to racial, social class, and economic reasons. Absent ladder and class disparities, the let among us could not enjoy as much constitutional protection of our liberties as we do... (Cole 5). The case of Gideon v. Wainwright can be used to illustrate this point. Cole summarizes the case:
Clarence Earl Gideon, a impecunious Florida man, down on his luck and charged with breaking and ledger entry a poolroom, claims that although he cant afford a layer, he has a constitutional right to have a lawyer institute by the state to defend him. When the Florida trial court denies his request, [Gideon] represents himself, and is convicted. From prison, [Gideon] sends a hand-written note to the Supreme Court asking it to hear his case. ...
Abe Fortas [is appointed] to lay out Gideons case, and then [the Court] rules that the Sixth Amendment guarantees indigent defendants the assistance of a lawyer in all serious criminal trials. On retrial, with a lawyer paid for by the states, Gideon is acquitted. (63)
The Gideon v. Wainwright may not appear to support the previous statement: Absent race and class disparities, the privileged among us could not enjoy as much constitutional protection of our liberties as we do... (Cole 5). The outcome of Gideon requires government to provide a lawyer to a defendant, [b]ut as long as the...
If you want to get a full essay, stray it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment