Is sexual urge social stratification merely a product of our biology and natural order or fuck we look to other explanations for the way in which men and women plump and act out their roles in society? In the pursuance discussion I will explore and examine the doctor of gender stratification through the lens of social constructionism and conflict theory. The seminal studies and work of anthropolist Margaret Mead, Sociologist Engels and Karl Marx may illuminate our view and offer our understanding of contemporary gender stratification and how we might resolve to it. In recent years understanding gender stratification the un bear upon distribution of wealth, power and resources - has become increasingly important from the perspective of both social constructionism the process by which hatful creatively shape society through social interaction - and conflict theory a theory that envisages society as an arena of divergence that generates conflict and change. This can be tell in terms of femininity and masculinity, however the dominant inequality generally evades the latter.
A brief look back at history shows that in more primitive hunter-gatherer societies, whose primary focusing was on subsistence rather than generating a surplus, men and women were upheld in equal status in society. However once surpluses formed in these societies this once symbiotic relationship took on a stark naked competitive dynamic as the male gender domineered.
Margaret Meads study of Papua New Guinean cultures is an interesting insight of how gender stratification (or lack of it) may be shaped by social constructionism. The most interesting of which was the Mountain Arapesh in which fine difference could be derived between sexes in terms of attitudes and behaviour. They were state to have exhibited qualities that many might consider feminine: they were, in...If you extremity to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment