American Constitution Law 3 J Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

American Constitution jurisprudence 3 J - Essay ExampleThe clause is there to protect accused persons or asseverate perpetrators from abuse in a number of ways, namely from a second trial for the resembling law-breaking after prosecution, acquittal, and against multiple punishments (Stephens & Scheb, 2008). In Johnsons case, he was already tried and nominate innocent of the purported crime.The clause also dictates that defendants cannot be tried for a lesser crime deep down the original crime (Stephens & Scheb, 2008). This gist that any crime that is seen to be lesser in nature to the original crime, but is merged within the murder, cannot be used to try and convict Johnson in a judicial system of law. Johnson has a right to quote the Double Jeopardy Article in the event you decide to take him to court over the same crime.I think it may be worthwhile mentioning that there are some instances where the rule may not apply, for instance if multiple offenses were carried out by Johnson, the clause does not apply to him. He could be tried for the other offenses he committed that may carry the same sentence or assurance as the murder of your family member. Unfortunately, this case may not be used to talk of the defendants conduct.There is also a reason why this testimony may not be comely to let Johnson go to court. The court would want to maintain the integrity and finality of all criminal proceedings. If the court were to summarily ignore the unsatisfactory outcomes of your case against Johnson, then its integrity would be called to question. This Clause is considered as angiotensin converting enzyme of the oldest concepts, and cannot easily be altered as people have tried over the years (Stephens & Scheb, 2008).In spite of the testimony provided by Johnsons brother on his deathbed, it may not be comfortable to ask for a retrial of Johnsons case. His Miranda rights did not apply at the time of the confession because it is a sentiment that anything sa id at that time is acceptable in court. He can be tried and found guilty of the